This, made me so happy that I want to tweet it every day: http://t.co/CQsLqELhKK Why an Attack on Sexism in Tech is NOT an Attack on Men
— Hannah Goraya (@yorkhannah) October 15, 2013
Simple mathematical model illustrates why women experience more sexist incidents than men, discounting other reasons http://t.co/1qRbA0ZT0G
— Martin Fowler (@martinfowler) October 14, 2013
Simple, to the point, modeled, read this, think about it. http://t.co/2rxPLiuIHQ
— Jorlock Kay (@_Jordan) October 14, 2013
The Petrie Multiplier shows that an attack on sexism in tech is not an attack on men. It's math. http://t.co/2iOpjJeGiS
— Karen McGrane (@karenmcgrane) October 14, 2013
@karenmcgrane Just what I needed today. Will be citing this later.
— Noah Iliinsky (@noahi) October 14, 2013
This is gold, for the pink blue swap “huh” moment alone. Oh, for the rest too. http://t.co/RDjFavly5y
— Martin Kopischke (@kopischke) October 14, 2013
reading some nice stuff such as Why an Attack on Sexism in Tech is NOT an Attack on Men by Ian Gent http://t.co/ko0thedARq....:)
— Tamas Puski (@TPuski) October 14, 2013
Read. Now. http://t.co/SbGDc7W8gh
— Adam Hannah (@dahlsr) October 14, 2013
“@lblanken: Sexism in tech: http://t.co/SzOlxBVxVa” Awesomeness. Very elegant, logical, unarguable smackdown of the "poor menz" fallacy.
— Dad Who Writes (@dadwhowrites) October 14, 2013
shout out to @turingfan for this: http://t.co/niwspEf39Q. my only beef: describing the problem as "sexist remarks" is far too kind.
— Dan Rosen (@mergeconflict) October 14, 2013
Sexism in tech is at least the square as bad as in gender balanced society. This is an understatement… http://t.co/LV2mfVshVI
— Frederic Barthelemy (@fbartho) October 14, 2013
My favorite reading all week: The Petrie Multiplier http://t.co/f1UsXv8di9 Math, science, & infographics; illustrate why experiences differ.
— Carina C. Zona (@cczona) October 14, 2013
Man, sometimes I really love math: http://t.co/IFbaZU73it
— Kevin Berridge (@kberridge) October 13, 2013
This probably needs a #geekfeminism wiki page RT @steveklabnik: Read this. http://t.co/80URH3Whta
— Skud (@Skud) October 13, 2013
Love this! A math theory explaining why women may experience more sexism even if men + women are equally sexist: http://t.co/7nV1ibqXVu
— Sarah Allen (@ultrasaurus) October 13, 2013
Read this. http://t.co/HaAKH1hnn5
— Steve Klabnik (@steveklabnik) October 13, 2013
OK. Stop what you’re doing and just read this: http://t.co/OFvdbi3B6l And all you men out there, don’t dwell on the pink vs. blue stuff.
— Brian V. Hughes (@brianvhughes) October 13, 2013
Wow. This is a great description of sexism, and how it works in practice. Very eye opening: http://t.co/g1DL2eQOB2
— Steven R. Baker (@srbaker) October 13, 2013
The Petrie effect - why an attack on sexism is NOT an Attack on Men: http://t.co/nSBm5hmypk cc @jarofgreen @philip_roberts
— Kate Ho (@kateho) October 13, 2013
The Petrie Multiplier: Why an Attack on Sexism in Tech is NOT an Attack on Men. http://t.co/xJQ68zemKa
— Ian Gent (@turingfan) October 13, 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment